markshwa.blogg.se

Forever book maggie stiefvater
Forever book maggie stiefvater





It may be accurate behaviour for wolves who are not family, but usually wolves live in families, so. However it does annoy me that Stiefvater didn't mention this at all. It actually makes perfect sense for the werewolves in these books to be acting more like captive wolves than wild ones, since they aren't a family group formed naturally, but rather a bunch of strangers forced together without any say in the matter. They are a bunch of strangers (essentially) who are forced together, much like captive wolves are, and that's where we usually see those alpha/beta/omega dynamics people love so much about wolves. that these wolves are not actually living in a family group. Wolves rarely accept other wolves into their lives and don't like strangers at all.īUT, what Stiefvater has written actually makes sense when you consider. A mom, a dad, and all their offspring live together, until the kids are old enough to leave and start families of their own. The term "family groups" is more accurate, since that's how wild wolves live. and completely disregards that wolves don't exactly live in packs. So let's talk about wolves! The book ends with Stiefvater mentioning how much research she did on wolf behaviour for the book and how pack dynamics are interesting. A lot of small mistakes that should've been caught before it being sent to print, like spelling it Canada instead of Kanada, as is the Swedish word. The translation felt a bit rushed though. The most immediate problems were solved, but not all of them. Most things were resolved in a way that made sense and I liked where it went, and that it left things rather open as to what would happen in the future. I thought this was a good end to the series.







Forever book maggie stiefvater